The following articles appeared on the main MISA propaganda machine yogaesoteric.net (yet again in their great hypocritical manner it's only available in Romanian, a usual tactic on their part, they as in the great worldly known and respected (haha) yoga school that's not willing to post their amazingly paranoid, hateful and of this sort of articles).
The subject is their usual hypocritical hateful "we're so superior to you all that you don't even see us" style is that homosexuality is not genetic so wrong. This coming from people who support sexual relationships between women, for the spiritual benefits of such actions. Don't get me wrong I, Mahashakti, personally don't have any problem with people having other sexual preferences than heterosexuality. I don't support pedophilia (unlike MISA, just think of the master begin accused of having sexual relations with an underage girl, and the comment of the vice-president of the organization at the time saying that the appearance of an obviously underage girl in one of the MISA theatrical performances filled with sexuality and NAKED people at the occasion of Bivolaru's birthday is not wrong because it was a long time ago and the girl is probably not a minor any more, yes you read that right that was what he said, not in those words, but this was obviously the message), but if people, no matter their gender, choose to have a particular type of sexual relationship, I don't have a problem with that, as long as it's consensual. And it makes no difference if that person is male or female. I'm not that hypocritical to support in a sublime and paranormal manner the sexual intercourse between two women, while on the homepage http://www.yogaesoteric.net/content.aspx?lang=RO&item=6216 of the movement I master there are hate filled articles against male homosexual relationships. Based on "science". That is my other big problem with them. They abuse science in horrendous ways. They either say science is wrong in an absolute manner, that when it does not support their obsessions, and say that science supports their claims and of course than it's great, when they find something that seems to remotely support their claims. Or the other version is that they use hundred (I kid not) year old medical papers to support their claims. Now I'm not saying that every article older than 10 years is wrong (of course not), I'm just saying that something that did not make it into the 21st century medical knowledge is not a good starting point for your argument.
And another funny (and typically MISA thing) is the name of the author. Ramona Bunescu. If your not familiar with the Romanian names, you should know that the -escu ending is typical for Romanian names (just think of Ceausescu, or Iliescu) and the first part of the name is Bun, which means good. So the name basically means (in the favorite MISA manner of manipulation on every possible level) that the author is a good person, and of course this means that you should really believe everything she said without any real evidence for what she's saying.
I'm not going to go into the details of how scientifically wrong, and how bad the arguments are, not to mention how hateful the articles are, I'm going to let a gay man answer the question of why is it wrong to discriminate against gay people for them (the topic is a certain user and the message is addressed to him, but regardless, the arguments that this person (Zinnia) is making are in my opinion perfect for this topic).